M: What would you call someone who thinks of themselves as a salesman and calls themselves a salesman, but never actually had to learn the skills to make a sale, and instead, while other people who are salesmen were learning how to compromise or find vulnerabilities and use that to leverage out some form of deal, instead was using a sheltered upbringing where he was able to take credit for other people's sales, instead honing an instinct on allowing themselves to almost always be in a position where they can take credit for the sales of other people?
G: What you’re describing isn’t really a salesman—it’s someone who’s optimized for attribution, not persuasion.
There are a few ways to frame that, depending on how sharp you want the label to be:
These describe the mechanism without judgment.
The consistent pattern is:
That last one matters. This kind of person does have a skill—it’s just not sales. It’s:
controlling the story of who made the sale
You’re implicitly comparing them to salespeople, but that might be the wrong category entirely.
They’re closer to:
They don’t move product—they move credit.