2025-04-04 19:19:04 EDT

M: In those pro-police shows like “law and crime”, do you know how much of their footage is edited out or rejected because the story just isn’t simple enough or pro-cop enough?

G: A lot more than they admit. Shows like Law & Crime, COPS, Live PD, or The First 48 are heavily curated to shape a coherent, usually pro-police narrative. Here’s what often gets left out or rejected:

  1. Cases with legal ambiguity or police mistakes – If an officer violates rights, uses questionable force, or botches a procedure, that footage is often cut entirely. They don’t want to undermine the image of competence.

  2. Cases where the suspect turns out innocent – These are usually boring for their format, and they also challenge the "bad guy caught by good guy" narrative. Even when shown, they’re often reframed to praise the police for being "thorough."

  3. Scenes with complex social context – Anything that complicates the moral clarity—like systemic poverty, mental illness, or addiction—is usually minimized or sanitized to keep the focus on personal culpability.

  4. Community backlash or criticism – Protests, bystanders questioning the cops, or internal dissent rarely make it to air unless framed negatively.

  5. Footage that doesn't "look good" – Slow arrests, dead ends, or cases without resolution aren't exciting or flattering, so they get left behind.

The producers have full editorial control, and police departments often get veto power over what's aired—especially for ride-along or embedded formats. It's not journalism; it's entertainment with a built-in PR filter.

Want examples of specific cases that got buried or misrepresented?

2025-04-04 19:24:59 EDT

M: First, can you give an exact or approximate percentage of how much gets cut? Or to triangulate on the answer I’m looking for, what percentage of police interactions are actually represented in form by what is displayed in the show?

G: There’s no official statistic, but we can triangulate based on production practices and available data:

1. Raw Footage vs. Aired Content

2. Police Interactions Nationally vs. What’s Shown

So if you’re asking:

What percentage of real police work is fairly represented in these shows, in tone and outcome?

The answer is probably under 5%—maybe closer to 1–3%. These shows heavily overrepresent:

They underrepresent:

So the form and function of most police work is not at all accurately represented. It’s cherry-picked theater.

2025-04-04 19:25:38 EDT

M: Can you give me a few specific examples now, please

G: Definitely. Here are a few examples of real incidents or patterns that either got buried, misrepresented, or outright avoided by pro-police shows like COPS, Live PD, or similar media:


1. Javier Ambler – Live PD (2019)


2. Overwhelming Arrest Focus on Low-Level Crimes – COPS


3. Use of Bystander Interventions – Rarely Shown


4. Mental Health and De-Escalation – Avoided or Sanitized


5. Complaints or Lawsuits – Never Followed Up


Want more in a particular category—like wrongful arrests, racial profiling, or civil suit aftermaths?